Recent Public Posts - [guest]
Re: My new car, as yet unbuilt, is already in love with me In "Buses and other ways to travel" [362021/30325/5] Posted by matth1j at 13:09, 7th June 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Previously I had done some on-line comparisons and reckon that the deal I signed up to wasn't too bad - with the convenience factor of having the dealer less than three miles away.
This lot appear to offer some decent discounts; never used them though. Probably useful if you want to use your dealer but need some haggling ammunition.https://www.carfile.net/buy-your-car/vauxhall/corsa.html
Re: Penleigh Park Level Crossing (Westbury Avoiding Line) Closure Application. In "London to the West" [362020/30322/12] Posted by a-driver at 11:22, 7th June 2025 Already liked by Timmer | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
£5,000,000 pounds for a footbridge to replace the crossing
Eyewatering!
I hesitate to imagine how that cost is broken down, but it's not all going to be design, steelwork and labour
Eyewatering!
I hesitate to imagine how that cost is broken down, but it's not all going to be design, steelwork and labour
Ridiculous. Someone mentioned it's a railway job, that's automatically an additional zero added!
Yep. We've been quoted £1,000,000 for Network Rail to provide a disabled ramp at Nailsea & Backwell.

And that's why infrastructure in the UK remains so antiquated
Re: Train hits tractor and trailer on level crossing 22/05/2025. In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [362019/30290/51] Posted by a-driver at 11:21, 7th June 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Interesting perspective on the issues and risks involved with these types of crossings in general.....
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/12K9u3WiHKT/
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/12K9u3WiHKT/
And you can't disagree with what that farmer is saying
When I worked in a box, we had a panel with a button for each crossing, anytime someone called from a crossing the button illuminated so we knew exactly what crossing they were be calling from. I don't know if that's still the case though.
Workload is a big issue. One signaller can only manage a certain amount of these crossings. If you've got 20 crossings in your area and a queue of calls waiting to be answered mistakes are going to be made. Signallers are only human, we are all prone to making mistakes, there needs to be a fail safe method of working.
Can't they just install automatic gates on all crossings, as seems to be the suggestion?
Or at least lights
Cost being the obvious answer, there's around 3,000 user worked crossings in the UK.... and then you could potentially argue it's another failure point adding more delay minutes. It would be interesting to see a breakdown of all those crossings based on linespeeds
Re: My new car, as yet unbuilt, is already in love with me In "Buses and other ways to travel" [362018/30325/5] Posted by Marlburian at 11:09, 7th June 2025 Already liked by Timmer | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I've threads on two other forums about this, and on one someone has replied "Luton has always been a van plant, not car - it started off as a Bedford truck factory. The only cars ever assembled there were Frontera 4x4s from 1992 to 2004, but it closed completely two months ago. Stellantis' only UK assembly plant is Ellesmere Port - and that stopped assembling Corsas in 2020 and Astras in 2022. It now assembles electric Berlingo/Partner/Doblo/Combo small vans and their car equivalents."
Re: My new car, as yet unbuilt, is already in love with me In "Buses and other ways to travel" [362017/30325/5] Posted by Timmer at 10:53, 7th June 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Another curiosity of the quotation, noticed only when I got home, was a £750 delivery fee. The salesman, in his third week in the job, seemed to think that car, a Vauxhall Corsa, would be made at Luton, 56 miles away; in fact production is in Zaragoza, Spain.
As far as I’m aware Vauxhall only build vans in Luton. I don’t know if that’s always been the case and that Vauxhall did once build cars at Luton as well. If they did it was a long time ago.Re: 30 cancellations on the North Downs this morning In "North Downs Line" [362016/30321/16] Posted by grahame at 10:12, 7th June 2025 Already liked by Timmer | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I have been suggesting a Weymouth trip ... however, weather forecast has got worse ... I will probably go to Melksham Station and make a last hour / minute / second choice there. I have pictures of Weymouth in the wet already!
Sigh, yes the weather doesn’t look good. I was planning a day trip today, but based on the forecast decided against. I’ve done Weymouth in the wet and I didn’t stay very long getting the next train home after a bite to eat.At Melksham - +17-2 on the 09:09 ... the major destination being Weymouth, and it was explained to me buy one group that it doesn't rain in the pub. Also passengerd headed towards Portsmouth and Taunton. No real reason to travel and lots else to do ... the photolibrary update of some parts of Weymouth can wait, so I am back home.
Re: My new car, as yet unbuilt, is already in love with me In "Buses and other ways to travel" [362015/30325/5] Posted by Marlburian at 10:08, 7th June 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thanks. With my low mileage the protection plans offer poorer value than they might for other drivers.
An irony is that I've never been too keen on cars and could almost cope without one. I do about 400 miles a year on necessary chores, such as the weekly Big Shop (though I've successfully used Home Delivery several times). In fact I've only motored 10,100 miles in 45 months (it would have been a bit more but for ill-health), and much of that was to get out into the country for walks - which I could do by public transport as I live conveniently close to a railway station serving five different routes.
Another curiosity of the quotation, noticed only when I got home, was a £750 delivery fee. The salesman, in his third week in the job, seemed to think that car, a Vauxhall Corsa, would be made at Luton, 56 miles away; in fact production is in Zaragoza, Spain.
I did some token havering, on the lines of "thinking about it over the weekend", but succumbed to the sales talk about the need to get my order in for an August delivery. Previously I had done some on-line comparisons and reckon that the deal I signed up to wasn't too bad - with the convenience factor of having the dealer less than three miles away. And no doubt those website prices would be lower than any final quotations.
Interesting perspective on the issues and risks involved with these types of crossings in general.....
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/12K9u3WiHKT/
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/12K9u3WiHKT/
And you can't disagree with what that farmer is saying
When I worked in a box, we had a panel with a button for each crossing, anytime someone called from a crossing the button illuminated so we knew exactly what crossing they were be calling from. I don't know if that's still the case though.
Workload is a big issue. One signaller can only manage a certain amount of these crossings. If you've got 20 crossings in your area and a queue of calls waiting to be answered mistakes are going to be made. Signallers are only human, we are all prone to making mistakes, there needs to be a fail safe method of working.
Can't they just install automatic gates on all crossings, as seems to be the suggestion?
Or at least lights
Re: Penleigh Park Level Crossing (Westbury Avoiding Line) Closure Application. In "London to the West" [362013/30322/12] Posted by rogerpatenall at 08:40, 7th June 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
But is any estimate from Network Rail not multiplied by a factor of 10 for 'Contribution to overheads'?
As an aside - at our old house in France we sometimes have to have estimates from builders, etc. We know that every time one looks at a job and says 'Bizarre' , that equates to another 0 on the end of the quote.
Re: My new car, as yet unbuilt, is already in love with me In "Buses and other ways to travel" [362011/30325/5] Posted by Western Pathfinder at 08:26, 7th June 2025 Already liked by Timmer | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Glad to hear that you have avoided being seriously overcharged by the dealer,for your protection packages,however they are a good idea especially the interior treatment,especially if the process comes with an inspection and re application after a period of time has gone by,as for the exterior bodywork,many reputable firms offer a ceramic paint coating service which I find makes life much easier especially when it comes to keeping the vehicles appearance up to the desired level,so it's worth having a shop around locally to see what's on offer .
As for extending the warranty,if what is offered by the dealer is backed by the manufacturer of the vehicle then it may well be worth considering,however if it's from a third party operation,then caveat emptor ! after sales warranty is not a guarantee,it is an insurance policy against mechanical failures,and in my experience and that of my customers,most offers leave a lot to be desired......
Good luck with your new purchase,and many happy miles/ years of trouble free motoring.
Re: 30 cancellations on the North Downs this morning In "North Downs Line" [362010/30321/16] Posted by eightonedee at 08:03, 7th June 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
As to Timmer's first post above (with GWR' s advice), that advice is totally inadequate. It assumes all traffic is through traffic from Reading to Gatwick and ignores the fact that the line is an important local line for the Blackwater Valley and Surrey Hills areas.
At the very least there should be advice that travellers between Reading and Farnborough and Guildford should go via Basingstoke and (in the latter case) Woking, Wokingham passengers should use SWT and some information on buses for other destinations. Have any arrangements been made for buses to accept GWR tickets? Some should be made ASAP.
Re: Train hits tractor and trailer on level crossing 22/05/2025. In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [362009/30290/51] Posted by TaplowGreen at 07:54, 7th June 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Interesting perspective on the issues and risks involved with these types of crossings in general.....
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/12K9u3WiHKT/
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/12K9u3WiHKT/
And you can't disagree with what that farmer is saying
When I worked in a box, we had a panel with a button for each crossing, anytime someone called from a crossing the button illuminated so we knew exactly what crossing they were be calling from. I don't know if that's still the case though.
Workload is a big issue. One signaller can only manage a certain amount of these crossings. If you've got 20 crossings in your area and a queue of calls waiting to be answered mistakes are going to be made. Signallers are only human, we are all prone to making mistakes, there needs to be a fail safe method of working.
Can't they just install automatic gates on all crossings, as seems to be the suggestion?
Re: 30 cancellations on the North Downs this morning In "North Downs Line" [362008/30321/16] Posted by Timmer at 07:51, 7th June 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I have been suggesting a Weymouth trip ... however, weather forecast has got worse ... I will probably go to Melksham Station and make a last hour / minute / second choice there. I have pictures of Weymouth in the wet already!
Sigh, yes the weather doesn’t look good. I was planning a day trip today, but based on the forecast decided against. I’ve done Weymouth in the wet and I didn’t stay very long getting the next train home after a bite to eat.Re: 30 cancellations on the North Downs this morning In "North Downs Line" [362007/30321/16] Posted by Timmer at 07:48, 7th June 2025 Already liked by eightonedee | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Cancellations to services between Reading and Gatwick Airport via Guildford
Due to more trains than usual needing repairs at the same time disruption is expected until the end of the day.
Train services between Reading and Gatwick Airport via Guildford and Redhill may be cancelled.
Customer Advice
What has happened?
Some of the trains that operate between Reading and Gatwick Airport have developed faults which means we are not able to use them until repaired. This means some services, in both directions, between Reading and Gatwick Airport will be cancelled.
What are we doing about it?
Our maintenance team are working on the trains to get them back into service as soon as we can.
What are my options?
Option 1: Use the National Rail Enquiries real-time journey planner to check if a journey by rail is currently possible. If you are at a station please check the Live Departure Boards or speak to a member of our station team.
Option 2: Your ticket can be used, at no extra cost, with the following operators, in both directions on these routes:
Elizabeth line services between London Paddington and Farringdon.
Thameslink services between Farringdon and Gatwick Airport.
South Western Railway services between Guildford and Clapham Junction.
Southern services between Clapham Junction and Gatwick Airport.
If you had intended to changing trains at Reading to catch a train towards Gatwick Airport, your ticket will be valid to continue on the train to London Paddington for travel via Farringdon.
Option 3: Replacement transport provided by us such as a buses, coaches or taxis, will not be provided as there are train services running. However, we will continue to monitor the need for this as the situation develops and provide updates here.
Option 4: Travel at a later time. You might want to consider postponing your journey until our service returns to normal.
Due to more trains than usual needing repairs at the same time disruption is expected until the end of the day.
Train services between Reading and Gatwick Airport via Guildford and Redhill may be cancelled.
Customer Advice
What has happened?
Some of the trains that operate between Reading and Gatwick Airport have developed faults which means we are not able to use them until repaired. This means some services, in both directions, between Reading and Gatwick Airport will be cancelled.
What are we doing about it?
Our maintenance team are working on the trains to get them back into service as soon as we can.
What are my options?
Option 1: Use the National Rail Enquiries real-time journey planner to check if a journey by rail is currently possible. If you are at a station please check the Live Departure Boards or speak to a member of our station team.
Option 2: Your ticket can be used, at no extra cost, with the following operators, in both directions on these routes:
Elizabeth line services between London Paddington and Farringdon.
Thameslink services between Farringdon and Gatwick Airport.
South Western Railway services between Guildford and Clapham Junction.
Southern services between Clapham Junction and Gatwick Airport.
If you had intended to changing trains at Reading to catch a train towards Gatwick Airport, your ticket will be valid to continue on the train to London Paddington for travel via Farringdon.
Option 3: Replacement transport provided by us such as a buses, coaches or taxis, will not be provided as there are train services running. However, we will continue to monitor the need for this as the situation develops and provide updates here.
Option 4: Travel at a later time. You might want to consider postponing your journey until our service returns to normal.
After all the recent promotion by GWR of taking the train to Gatwick airport from Reading, this is most unfortunate and highlights the need to get on with procuring new trains to replace the turbos.
Re: 30 cancellations on the North Downs this morning In "North Downs Line" [362006/30321/16] Posted by grahame at 07:22, 7th June 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Last Saturday the Weymouth service was operated by 166 207. I believe all the 166s are based at St Philip’s Marsh.
...
...
I have been suggesting a Weymouth trip ... however, weather forecast has got worse ... I will probably go to Melksham Station and make a last hour / minute / second choice there. I have pictures of Weymouth in the wet already!
Re: 30 cancellations on the North Downs this morning In "North Downs Line" [362005/30321/16] Posted by TaplowGreen at 07:14, 7th June 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
05:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading due 07:33
06:28 Reading to Gatwick Airport due 07:54
06:51 Reading to Redhill due 08:28
07:52 Reading to Gatwick Airport due 09:26
07:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading due 09:30
08:36 Redhill to Reading due 09:57
09:30 Gatwick Airport to Reading due 11:04
09:54 Reading to Gatwick Airport due 11:25
10:24 Reading to Gatwick Airport due 11:55
11:24 Reading to Gatwick Airport due 12:55
11:29 Gatwick Airport to Reading due 12:57
11:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading due 13:27
12:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading due 14:27
13:24 Reading to Gatwick Airport due 14:55
13:54 Reading to Gatwick Airport due 15:25
14:54 Reading to Gatwick Airport due 16:25
14:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading due 16:28
15:29 Gatwick Airport to Reading due 17:02
16:29 Gatwick Airport to Reading due 18:00
16:50 Reading to Gatwick Airport due 18:25
17:20 Reading to Gatwick Airport due 18:55
18:21 Reading to Gatwick Airport due 19:55
18:29 Gatwick Airport to Reading due 19:57
18:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading due 20:28
19:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading due 21:37
20:22 Reading to Gatwick Airport due 21:57
20:54 Reading to Gatwick Airport due 22:25
22:01 Gatwick Airport to Reading due 23:21
22:30 Gatwick Airport to Reading due 00:17
23:33 Reading to Gatwick Airport due 01:08
23:33 Reading to Gatwick Airport due 01:08 will be cancelled.
This is due to a fault on this train.
06:28 Reading to Gatwick Airport due 07:54
06:51 Reading to Redhill due 08:28
07:52 Reading to Gatwick Airport due 09:26
07:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading due 09:30
08:36 Redhill to Reading due 09:57
09:30 Gatwick Airport to Reading due 11:04
09:54 Reading to Gatwick Airport due 11:25
10:24 Reading to Gatwick Airport due 11:55
11:24 Reading to Gatwick Airport due 12:55
11:29 Gatwick Airport to Reading due 12:57
11:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading due 13:27
12:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading due 14:27
13:24 Reading to Gatwick Airport due 14:55
13:54 Reading to Gatwick Airport due 15:25
14:54 Reading to Gatwick Airport due 16:25
14:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading due 16:28
15:29 Gatwick Airport to Reading due 17:02
16:29 Gatwick Airport to Reading due 18:00
16:50 Reading to Gatwick Airport due 18:25
17:20 Reading to Gatwick Airport due 18:55
18:21 Reading to Gatwick Airport due 19:55
18:29 Gatwick Airport to Reading due 19:57
18:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading due 20:28
19:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading due 21:37
20:22 Reading to Gatwick Airport due 21:57
20:54 Reading to Gatwick Airport due 22:25
22:01 Gatwick Airport to Reading due 23:21
22:30 Gatwick Airport to Reading due 00:17
23:33 Reading to Gatwick Airport due 01:08
23:33 Reading to Gatwick Airport due 01:08 will be cancelled.
This is due to a fault on this train.
All train faults / More trains than usual needing repairs at the same time. Is there some general problem?
I'm not sure what the diagram is this summer of the Saturday Swindon to Weymouth train, but can anyone advise if the risk of it being cancelled tomorrow (I think it's been a Reading based unit in the past) is significant?
Similar story today.
Re: First Group announce new open access service to Hereford In "London to the Cotswolds" [362004/30323/14] Posted by Richard Fairhurst at 22:43, 6th June 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The head of Open Access at FirstGroup posts to a Certain Other Forum and is adamant that there are Chinese walls between the DfT-contracted parts of First and the OA parts! Which I'm sure is true.
I think the point is rather that DfT mandated GWR to make savings; the little-used Cotswold through services to Hereford were an easy way to cut a lot of (effectively) dead mileage; and so it happened. Can't blame them at all for that.
But (Chinese walls notwithstanding) First's OA division will be very aware that the gains from Hereford itself are not that huge. Effectively this is a way of running OA services from Bristol Parkway to Paddington, with a little bit of extra revenue from Cwmbran, Abergavenny and Hereford.
Re: To Aachen and back- by train In "The Wider Picture Overseas" [362003/30319/52] Posted by Oxonhutch at 22:14, 6th June 2025 Already liked by eightonedee | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I believe the town was acquired after the first significant disagreement, and German in that part of the country is the official one.
Re: Penleigh Park Level Crossing (Westbury Avoiding Line) Closure Application. In "London to the West" [362002/30322/12] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 22:08, 6th June 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
£5,000,000 pounds for a footbridge to replace the crossing
Eyewatering!
I hesitate to imagine how that cost is broken down, but it's not all going to be design, steelwork and labour
Eyewatering!
I hesitate to imagine how that cost is broken down, but it's not all going to be design, steelwork and labour
Ridiculous. Someone mentioned it's a railway job, that's automatically an additional zero added!
Yep. We've been quoted £1,000,000 for Network Rail to provide a disabled ramp at Nailsea & Backwell.

Re: To Aachen and back- by train In "The Wider Picture Overseas" [362001/30319/52] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 21:45, 6th June 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
... and the on-train signs and announcements switched to Flemish.
I wonder if, when the train approaches the Belgian town of Eupen, the announcements all change to German.Ahem. "Don't mention the War", as Basil Fawlty said.

Re: First Group announce new open access service to Hereford In "London to the Cotswolds" [362000/30323/14] Posted by ChrisB at 21:05, 6th June 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
If the DfT request that GWR drop shared services with another TOC & the operator disagrees, of course they form an OA opportunity
Re: 2025 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury In "TransWilts line" [361999/29726/18] Posted by TaplowGreen at 19:46, 6th June 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
17:50 Gloucester to Salisbury due 20:06
17:50 Gloucester to Salisbury due 20:06 will no longer call at Chippenham, Trowbridge and Dilton Marsh.
It will be starting late from Gloucester.
This is due to trespassers on the railway earlier today.
Re: My new car, as yet unbuilt, is already in love with me In "Buses and other ways to travel" [361998/30325/5] Posted by Marlburian at 19:06, 6th June 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Oops, I omitted the last part of the cutesy letter and my comment, and I can't modify my original post. It should have continued:
... ) and the things you will need to do.
If you have any questions, just call; they are a friendly bunch.
Missing you already!
Your New Car"
Yuk? I do hope that the car won't be too upset because I opted out of £800+ of bodywork & interior protection and chip repair insurance. In a moment of weakness I agreed to pay £332 for an extended warranty, but may cancel that. The dealer's trade-in offer for my car was disappointing at £8000; the day before another dealer with whom I'd discussed another car offered £8,500. Webuyanycar offered £9,200, increased a day later to £9,410, though they're unaware of a couple of bodywork blemishes that the dealers know about. The Road Fund was a bit of a shock -I gather there there's a hefty premium for the first year. And I wasn't amused by the fact that it runs from June 1. Delivery is estimated for early August (four weeks before the MoT, Road Fund renewal and service for my existing car fall due).
Re: My new car, as yet unbuilt, is already in love with me In "Buses and other ways to travel" [361997/30325/5] Posted by JayMac at 18:59, 6th June 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Anthropomorphising (that took several goes to spell correctly!) a new car purchase? Nothing new under the sun when it comes to marketing. Although it seems a little bit OTT when the dealer has already (presumably) got your money.
My new car, as yet unbuilt, is already in love with me In "Buses and other ways to travel" [361996/30325/5] Posted by Marlburian at 18:01, 6th June 2025 Already liked by Mark A, JayMac, PhilWakely | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
This morning I ordered a new car and on my return home found several emails from the dealer including this:
"I'm so excited. When I heard you'd placed an order for me my heart jumped a beat; we're going to have such fun together.
Before we can start our adventure, the lovely people at [dealer] will do lots of things and they've asked me to explain. You will see a timeline above of next steps and in the box below they have detailed what they will do to get me ready (looking forward for that bit
Re: Announcement - Billions of investment on tram, train and bus projects. In "Looking forward - the next 5, 10 and 20 years" [361993/30318/40] Posted by Red Squirrel at 15:06, 6th June 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Here's WECA's press release:
West welcomes record transport funding
Leaders across the region have today welcomed more than three-quarters of a billion pounds set to be invested in transport projects in the West. The Chancellor has announced plans to more than double investment in local transport in England’s city regions, committing to “investment in all parts of the country, not just a few.”
Around £150 million would further improve rail infrastructure across the region and support ambitions for four trains per hour across our growing suburban rail network, including between economic growth zones like Brabazon and Bristol Temple Quarter.
With the West of England Mayoral Combined Authority area already benefitting from a nearly 50% increase in funding to fix potholes this year compared to last year, we are paving the way to the future. Continued funding through transport settlements is supporting the maintenance and enhancement of roads, bridges, and active travel routes. These essential improvements – delivered through close collaboration between local councils and the Mayoral Combined Authority – are not just about upkeep; they’re enabling the long-term transformation of how people move around the region.
This news comes just a day after the opening of Bristol’s first electric bus depot in Hengrove, with electrification set to take place in Bath and Lawrence Hill next year. More than 250 new electric buses are set to serve bus passengers across our region next year. Some £200 million of the new funding from the Treasury would provide scope to improve and extend services, transform the network, and deliver an electric fleet and the associated charging infrastructure.
Significant funding, in the region of £200 million, would enable mass transit development between Bath, Bristol, South Gloucestershire, and North Somerset. Trams, an extension of the popular Metrobus services, rail, light rail, and guided buses are all currently on the table. In the autumn, a new transport vision will set out the long-term direction of travel for the West of England.
Welcoming the news one month after she became Mayor, Helen Godwin, the new Mayor of the West of England, said:
“Our region has a strong economy overall, but we know that congestion has held the West of England back from achieving its full potential. We’ve been stuck in the slow lane on transport for too long. Our potential additional contribution to the national economy is enormous. It’s time to invest in the West and unlock that growth.
“I promised to work with government and get the West of England moving. Three-quarters of a billion pounds of new money for transport will do just that, as we start a new chapter for our region. Together, we need to accelerate plans to secure better buses, deliver more trains and railway stations, and give local people proper alternatives to their cars. Trams, Metrobuses, rail, light rail, and guided buses are all on the table to make that a reality.
“Over the years, as a region, we’ve talked too much about mass transit and delivered too little. It’s finally time to deliver a mass transit system that people can rely on. Working with the new government, and with genuine collaboration between local councils, it’s time for real change.”
Sarah Warren, Deputy Council Leader and Cabinet Member for Sustainable Bath and North East Somerset, said:
“This investment marks a turning point for sustainable transport in our region. It is a huge opportunity to deliver a cleaner, greener and more connected future that our communities deserve. From progressing mass transit options to electrifying our bus fleet across Bath & North East Somerset, this investment will help us tackle costly congestion, achieve our net zero targets, and make it easier for people to choose public transport, walking and cycling. On top of the work that’s already being achieved in B&NES, this is welcome news for our region. We look forward to working with our regional partners to deliver a transport system fit for the 21st century.”
Councillor Tony Dyer, Leader of Bristol City Council, said:
“This fresh investment is very welcome and allows us to finally begin to achieve the regional mass transit system we've needed for so long. Our plans are already in place to make our bus networks more available, to expand the reach and access of rail and to connect the communities of Bristol with opportunities in our city and the wider West of England. This new funding will allow us to get on with creating the transport system Bristol is crying out for.
“I look forward to working with Helen and my fellow leaders to deliver for the people in our region.”
Councillor Maggie Tyrrell, Leader of South Gloucestershire Council, said:
“We’re very pleased to see this significant funding coming to the West of England that will help us move towards a fully integrated public transport system that works for residents and businesses. Investment in the region’s transport infrastructure is vital to help people keep moving around the area and we need better, more reliable bus services, more trains, and a mass transit system to offer more effective and sustainable travel choices.”
Cllr Mike Bell, the Leader of North Somerset Council, said:
“I welcome this funding as a positive step forward for our region. It’s vital that North Somerset benefits from mass transit development, which has the potential to transform how people travel and support our transition to a greener, more connected future. I’m committed to working closely with the Mayor and our partners to improve transport, unlock growth, and ensure our local economy continues to thrive.”
The new government set out the record settlement to the West of England Mayoral Combined Authority through Transport for City Regions as part of the Plan for Change, ahead of next week’s Spending Review.
The West of England delivered the strongest recent growth of any combined authority area (3%, 2023). The region is also predicted to achieve double the national forecast rate of productivity growth by 2040.
I've highlighted a couple of phrases:
"...support ambitions for four trains per hour across our growing suburban rail network" is very welcome. That would mean new trains, and some infrastructure interventions. (Doubling from Narroways to Clifton Down? Quad track to Parson St?) Would you do that without electrifying? I think 'ambitions' are slightly closer to plans than 'aspirations' are, but I may be getting ahead of myself.
"Trams, an extension of the popular Metrobus services, rail, light rail, and guided buses are all currently on the table". Be nice if they stated clearly that tram trains are on the table too, as WSP took them off it - wrongly, in my humble opinion!
Re: Penleigh Park Level Crossing (Westbury Avoiding Line) Closure Application. In "London to the West" [361992/30322/12] Posted by Mark A at 14:37, 6th June 2025 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
**Snip**
All the houses they've built around Penleigh Park LC though, surely improvements to the crossing should have formed part of the developers planning application and funded by them.
Indeed. No one would consider building a housing estate without funding road access, why is ok to build one and not fund the needed improvements to its supporting active travel infrastructure. The diversion's lengthy and its poor quality as a walking route is baked in. It would be good if someone found a budget for this.
Mark
Mark